The Stepney Tragedy.
 |
| Dr Ewbank SLSA: [B 11286/6/1] |
Last week I wrote
about Police Inspector Charles Le Lievre who was a member of the South Australian
Mounted Police Force between 1877 and 1929. I published a transcript of his
encounter with some ruffian sailors at Nairne. At the end of his story,
LeLeivre recounts that one of those men would later murder his wife at Stepney,
South Australia. This is that story.
Louisa Jane Fisher
was a newly married 22-year-old living on Henry Street, Stepney, with her new
husband, Frederick Fisher. Louisa was a daughter of John Lampey, a builder in
Balaklava. The couple had met when Fisher had taken a job with her father. Unbeknownst
to her, Fisher had recently been released from gaol for threatening to kill a
police officer in Nairne.
The Fishers had moved to Glenelg, and
camped on the sand dunes, before finding their humble cottage in Stepney.
The Express and Telegraph newspaper described the house:
The interior of the bouse wore an extremely forlorn aspect,
and was suggestive of the direst poverty. In the front room, there was
absolutely nothing in the shape of furniture or effects. The kitchen was almost
as barren, and with the exception of a little firewood, and an axe, was also empty.
There is also a middle room, which had evidently been used as the bedroom… which
was likewise unfurnished. On the floor were spread a number of blankets, which
had apparently been used as a bed. Several articles of clothing were lying
near, a silver watch was hanging on one of the walls, and on another wall was a
neat American clock.
Frederick Fisher was
28 years old, an ex-sailor, and a recent gaol inmate.
On 18 January 1900, at about 7pm, a gunshot was heard fired
within the Henry street cottage. Within minutes, Fisher had run to his
neighbour, Mrs Emma Richards house next door, and told her his wife had
accidentally shot herself. He asked her if she would go to the police station,
which she refused. Fisher then ran to the St. Peters police station and
reported the event to Constable Richmond, who told Fisher to go directly to Dr
Ewbank.
Dr Ewbank, Fisher, and a police
constable all arrived on the scene at the same time. Meanwhile, a phone call
about the shooting had placed at the Norwood police station. Sergeant Burchell
of Norwood informed the coroner, then made his way to the house.
On the arrival of the coroner, an examination of the body was made, and it was discovered
that the bullet had penetrated the left breast, and was lodged in the lungs.
The ambulance van was sent for, and the body removed to the morgue.
An inquest was held a week later at the Elephant and Castle Hotel. Dr Ramsey Smith, the city Coroner,
presided over the inquest, with Dr A. Mackie, a member of the hospital board
present.
Dr Ewbank delivered his evidence: He stated he had found the
woman’s body lying on its back on the floor. Her left arm was across her chest and her right arm by her side. Her clothing had been drawn back across her
chest. Ewbank watched a police constable find the revolver 10 feet away among
the ragged bedding on the floor.
Ewbank also conducted the post mortem
examination, in which he deduced that the bullet entered her body near her
sternum under her third rib, it had travelled through her heart, and into her
spine. He found no black scorch marks on her skin or clothing.
Ewbank stated further:
That from the direction of the wound it might have been
self-inflicted, but not accidentally. As a
rule, in cases of suicide by shooting there were evidence of burning or scorching,
but in this case, the traces might have been obscured by the blood on the
clothing. The skin would not have been visibly blistered through the clothing. If
the deceased had been standing up the shot would have been fired from above,
but if lying down by someone behind her head, or someone stooping over her.
Taking all the circumstances into consideration he would not feel justified in
saying whether the death was accidental, suicidal, or murderous. Deceased
might have emitted a spasmodic shriek as she fell.
Charles Richards was
questioned as a witness, he stated that non the night in question, he had seen
Frederick Fisher in the backyard. He claimed Fisher entered the house, and a
few moments later the gunshot rang out. He then heard Fisher out the front
shouting for someone to call the police. When he (Richards) got out the front,
Fisher was running along Henry Street toward the police station.[6]
After a short retirement, the Jury delivered the following
verdict: “We are of opinion that the deceased, Eliza Louisa Jane Fisher, came
to her death from a bullet wound, but that there is not sufficient evidence to
show by whom the shot was fired.”
Many people had assumed that Frederick Fisher had shot his
wife, even though he had stated in court it was an accident. Immediately after
the jury delivered their verdict, Frederick Fisher was arrested. As it turned
out, when police were investigating the death of Eliza, they had stumbled upon
some loose floorboards in the home. On pulling them up they found a large cache
of stolen goods, which they had taken and identified as stolen from the Glenelg
area.
Fisher was charged committing a burglary
in Glenelg.
In court, Fisher’s only excuse for stealing from the Glenelg
homes of Phillip Simmons, Robert Hood, George Blyth, and Agnes Storrie was, “I
was destitute at the time.”
Fisher pleaded guilty to charges of
burglary and larceny, of which he pleaded guilty to all accounts.
Frederick Fisher, an old offender, was sentenced
to two terms of three years, and one term of two years for breaking and
entering and larceny, respectively.
Researched and written by Allen Tiller © 2020.
'SHOOTING FATALITY.', The Express and Telegraph, (19 January 1900), p. 3.
(ONE O'CLOCK EDITION), http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article208842536.
'AT THE POLICE COURT.', The Express and Telegraph, (22 January
1900), p. 2. (ONE O'CLOCK EDITION), http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article208842668.
